Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Julie Gabrielli's avatar

As a college professor who certainly has many beefs with the state of higher ed today, I find this argument triggering. It depresses me that the answer to the very legit question: “What do you do when 34% of your students sometimes struggle to find at least 2 meals a day?” is to treat higher ed as vocational training for individuals seeking to increase their earning potential. Why can't the answer to the question be, "Make college available and affordable (if not free) to ALL who have the interest, commitment and aptitude"? I understand that higher ed is far more global now, but looking for a one-size-fits-all solution isn't the answer. Many high-touch fields require high-touch educations on a diversity of subjects (including ethics) that take place in community with others. I mean, Epicurus' followers gathered *in a garden* to hash out ideas *together*.

The internet is too isolating to teach / learn / experience living and learning in community. I'm worried that the best this approach will do is turn out even more individualistic people, at a time when collaboration in community is what's most needed to address today's wicked challenges.

It's probaby true that liberal arts derives from white privilege and is tainted by colonial, western myopia. But there are other brilliant thinkers that we can learn from, not throw the whole thing out in favor of fast-tracking training for jobs that are still firmly entrenched in capitalist systems.

Expand full comment
Deanna Kreisel's avatar

Hi Elle -- I appreciate the sentiment behind this idea, but I fear that what such programs will do is create (or rather, further entrench) a multi-tiered university education system in which the rich will get richer. In this version of the future, there will still be 4-year degrees available from the most prestigious institutions (believe me, Harvard et al. will NEVER get rid of their liberal arts electives) and the rest of the great unwashed will earn 3-year vocational degrees. The rich and privileged will be skimmed off for the best (white-color, managerial, high-paying) jobs because, believe it or not, such employers want well-rounded employees who can write and think clearly. Everyone else will be slotted straight into dead-end middle-management and other "vocational" jobs. This is basically how the system works now, but informally -- this plan will simply make the tracking more blatant. The only way to achieve what you (and I and Epicurus) want is state-funded, excellent university educations available to all.

Expand full comment
61 more comments...

No posts