Hmmm, I suppose I don't think there was a time in the past when we were somehow much more moral and thus more able to act in an anarchist manner. There was a time, however, when we were much smaller groups of people, and thus had less cause for friction?
Hmmm, I suppose I don't think there was a time in the past when we were somehow much more moral and thus more able to act in an anarchist manner. There was a time, however, when we were much smaller groups of people, and thus had less cause for friction?
ah, sorry ... I wasn't saying "people were more moral" ... I was saying that Society is *why* we have morals as individuals, and without the structure of society creating moral individuals then we need a society which reigns in individuals via law ... anarchism falsely believes they can do without both.
Hmmm, I suppose I don't think there was a time in the past when we were somehow much more moral and thus more able to act in an anarchist manner. There was a time, however, when we were much smaller groups of people, and thus had less cause for friction?
ah, sorry ... I wasn't saying "people were more moral" ... I was saying that Society is *why* we have morals as individuals, and without the structure of society creating moral individuals then we need a society which reigns in individuals via law ... anarchism falsely believes they can do without both.
Ahhhhhhh, yes ok I very much agree with you there!